We should not blindly accept conclusion,because the premises are shaky and the method flawed; if you want change we need other experiments not repetition.

this article is so serious i accidentally wore slippers to comment; still i learn something though.

if we disagree we should present alternative models and test; the piece lacks a robust debate.

Informativ point: it cites sources and shows a trend line but it miss some counter points; check footnotes for data.

Loved how the article break down the idea, it feed my brain good and i feel hopeful about the future.

not impressed, too long, too dense, and some terms confuse readers; skip.

the article point out data sources, sample size and limitations, its good for researchers but need more context.

this post give practical steps and clear examples, i will try them; nice job.

sure, because a single article solved everything; obviously more preaching than facts; wow so original.

really a fresh view, it give me new angle, hope this ignite more thoughtful talks around the topic.

lol i reading it, my cat also reading, we both nodding like two professors; who proofread this?

oh great another piece that solves world hunger with a chart, how convinient; meta-irony abound.

I dont buy the whole thing, the writer cherry picked facts and ignore other side, its just propaganda, not useful.

great, another eye opening piece that tell us nothing new, i should frame it as a museum exhibit.