Yandalula – Pawaboy

I disagree with the piece, it oversimplifys the issue and misses key data, not very convincing.

really well written and balanced, i appreciate the fair assessment and the nuanced perspective.

This article hit all the marks, i really like how it connects theory with real world apps, very well done.

Informative: it outlines the timeline and sources, but i wish they included more peer reviewed studies to give reader more depth.

not convinced, the reasoning relies on vague generalizations and the conclusion feel sham.

informative: presents data and quotes, though the methodology could use explication.

Oh look, another article that solves everything in one paragraph, how quaint.

I think the author should address the main counterpoints directly, otherwise the piece reads as propaganda.

This is so serious i spit my tea, great read even my plant enjoyed it.

Sure, totally trust the numbers, theyre flawless; next theyll cure cancer with footnotes.

I argue that the article fails to consider counterarguments, therefore its conclusion is premature and biased; you cant just assert x without y.